Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098988›Full record

ArticleRevista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia)2023

[Planning for death with dignity: an international clinical and educational approach under the umbrella of citizens' knowledge].

José Manuel Jiménez-Rodríguez

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

José Manuel Jiménez-RodríguezJJ: Lic. Antropología Social y Cultural. Ph. D. Ciencias Sociales, Facultad de Trabajo Social, Departamento de Sociología, Trabajo Social y Salud Pública, Universidad de Huelva, Campus "El Carmen". Huelva, España. jose.jimenez@dstso.uhu.es Universidad de Huelva Facultad de Trabajo Social Departamento de Sociología, Trabajo Social y Salud Pública Universidad de Huelva Huelva España jose.jimenez@dstso.uhu.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To identify university students' knowledge and perception of the process of dignified death. Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study involving postgraduate students of the International University of La Rioja (Spain), enrolled during the academic year 2020-2021. A simple random sampling was carried out with N=215. Inclusion criteria were to be aged between 25-65 years and have a clear command of Spanish. A self-adminis-tered questionnaire was used for data collection. A descriptive and bivariate analysis of the data obtained was carried out. Results: 136 individuals participated. Knowledge of the right to a dignified death and its regulations represented an average of 5.43. The 6.56 think that in their environment peo-ple talk openly about death, and 6.59 believe that in their city the responsibility for the patient's health-illness process lies with the doctor. An average of 9.22 think it is necessary for schools to provide pupils with information/education on the process of life and death. Discussion: the participants in the study have a fair knowledge of the regulation of death with dignity, but they perceive this right favourably and consider the need for its dissemination by health and educational institutions.

Indexed as

Advance decision planningdeatheducation (source: MeSH, NLM)knowledgeperception

Identifiers

PMID40098988
PMCPMC11665045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.