ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Interpretable machine learning model for early morbidity risk prediction in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: a multi-center study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on neutrophil extracellular traps in sepsis‑induced coagulopathy (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Targeting inflammation and coagulation: MMP-9 deficiency exacerbates sepsis induced acute lung injury through fibrinogen-driven inflammation.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for early prediction of sepsis-induced coagulopathy: a multicenter retrospective development and validation study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Risk stratification of ibrutinib toxicity co-administered with triazole antifungals: insights from real-world pharmacovigilance and clinical evidence.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Bug Wars: Artificial Intelligence Strikes Back in Sepsis Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Early prediction of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in the ICU using interpretable machine learning: a multi-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Global Research Trends in Sepsis-Associated Coagulopathy: A Web of Science-Based Bibliometric Analysis (2000-2024).Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Development and Validation of an Early Risk Prediction Model for Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy Based on Machine Learning.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) is a complex condition characterized by systemic inflammation and coagulopathy. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict SIC risk in patients with sepsis. Methods: Patients with sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between March 1, 2021, and March 1, 2024, at Hebei General Hospital and Handan Central Hospital (East District) were retrospectively included. Patients were categorized into SIC and non-SIC groups. Data were split into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Additionally, for temporal validation, patients with sepsis admitted between March 1, 2024, and October 31, 2024, at Hebei General Hospital were included. Feature selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate logistic regression. Nine ML algorithms were tested, and model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, including area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The SHaply Additive Explanations (SHAP) algorithm was used to interpret the best-performing model and visualize key predictors. Results: Among 847 patients with sepsis, 480 (56.7%) developed SIC. The random forest (RF) model with eight variables performed best, achieving AUCs of 0.782 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.745, 0.818] in the training set, 0.750 (95% CI: 0.690, 0.809) in the testing set, and 0.784 (95% CI: 0.711, 0.857) in the validation set. Key predictors included activated partial thromboplastin time, lactate, oxygenation index, and total protein. Conclusions: This ML model reliably predicts SIC risk. SHAP enhances interpretability, supporting early, individualized interventions to improve outcomes in patients with sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.