ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2025
FAIR African brain data: challenges and opportunities.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A perspective on AI implementation in medical imaging in LMICs: challenges, priorities, and strategies.European radiology · 2026Article
- Repeatable tract-based diffusion metrics on a portable 64 mT MRI: a foundation for global population neuroscience.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2026Article
- An open-access EEG dataset from indigenous African populations for schizophrenia research.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The effectiveness of research and innovation often relies on the diversity or heterogeneity of datasets that are Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR). However, the global landscape of brain data is yet to achieve desired levels of diversity that can facilitate generalisable outputs. Brain datasets from low-and middle-income countries of Africa are still missing in the global open science ecosystem. This can mean that decades of brain research and innovation may not be generalisable to populations in Africa. Methods: This research combined experiential learning or experiential research with a survey questionnaire. The experiential research involved deriving insights from direct, hands-on experiences of collecting African Brain data in view of making it FAIR. This was a critical process of action, reflection, and learning from doing data collection. A questionnaire was then used to validate the findings from the experiential research and provide wider contexts for these findings. Results: The experiential research revealed major challenges to FAIR African brain data that can be categorised as socio-cultural, economic, technical, ethical and legal challenges. It also highlighted opportunities for growth that include capacity development, development of technical infrastructure, funding as well as policy and regulatory changes. The questionnaire then showed that the wider African neuroscience community believes that these challenges can be ranked in order of priority as follows: Technical, economic, socio-cultural and ethical and legal challenges. Conclusion: We conclude that African researchers need to work together as a community to address these challenges in a way to maximise efforts and to build a thriving FAIR brain data ecosystem that is socially acceptable, ethically responsible, technically robust and legally compliant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.