Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098905›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2025

Bioequivalence Study of Single-Pill Capsule Formulation of Amlodipine Plus Benazepril in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.

Haojing Song, Bo Qiu, Xue Sun, Caihui Guo, Yiting Hu, Zhanjun Dong, Yang Liu, Wanjun Bai

Abstract readEquivalence TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haojing SongDepartment of Pharmacy, Hebei General Hospital, Hebei Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China.
Bo QiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Hebei General Hospital, Hebei Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China.
Xue SunDepartment of Pharmacy, Hebei General Hospital, Hebei Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China.
Caihui GuoDepartment of Pharmacy, Hebei General Hospital, Hebei Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China.
Yiting HuDepartment of Pharmacy, Hebei General Hospital, Hebei Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China.
Zhanjun DongDepartment of Pharmacy, Hebei General Hospital, Hebei Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China.
Yang LiuHebei Longhai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Shijiazhuang, 052165, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0009-5915-0808
Wanjun BaiDepartment of Pharmacy, Hebei General Hospital, Hebei Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0008-3266-8765

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and safety profiles of test and reference amlodipine/benazepril capsules under both fasting and fed states, determine the bioequivalence between the two formulations, and provide sufficient evidence for new drug application. Subjects and Methods: The bioequivalence study was conducted utilizing a randomized, open-label design, involving two formulations administered in a single-dose format. Healthy Chinese participants who met the eligibility criteria were administered a single dose of the test or reference amlodipine/benazepril capsule. Blood samples were taken serially for up to 168 hours post-administration during each period, and the plasma levels of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method. For bioequivalence evaluation, geometric mean ratios comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters of the test drug with those of the reference drug were calculated along with their corresponding 90% confidence intervals. Safety assessments were conducted throughout the duration of the study. Results: The PK parameters of the test formulation were found to be comparable to those of the reference formulation under both fasting and fed conditions. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios comparing the test and reference formulations for the peak concentration (Cmax), the area under the curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between the test and reference formulation in healthy individuals was confirmed under both fasting and fed states, meeting regulatory standards set for the study. Both drug formulations demonstrated safety and tolerability.

Indexed as

AmlodipineBenzazepinesFastingAdministration, OralAdultCapsulesChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDrug CombinationsEast Asian PeopleFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleTandem Mass SpectrometryTherapeutic EquivalencyYoung AdultAmlodipinebenazeprilBenzazepinesCapsulesDrug CombinationsAmlodipinebenazeprilbenazeprilatbioequivalencepharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID40098905
PMCPMC11912929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.