Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2025
Bioequivalence Study of Single-Pill Capsule Formulation of Amlodipine Plus Benazepril in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and safety profiles of test and reference amlodipine/benazepril capsules under both fasting and fed states, determine the bioequivalence between the two formulations, and provide sufficient evidence for new drug application. Subjects and Methods: The bioequivalence study was conducted utilizing a randomized, open-label design, involving two formulations administered in a single-dose format. Healthy Chinese participants who met the eligibility criteria were administered a single dose of the test or reference amlodipine/benazepril capsule. Blood samples were taken serially for up to 168 hours post-administration during each period, and the plasma levels of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method. For bioequivalence evaluation, geometric mean ratios comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters of the test drug with those of the reference drug were calculated along with their corresponding 90% confidence intervals. Safety assessments were conducted throughout the duration of the study. Results: The PK parameters of the test formulation were found to be comparable to those of the reference formulation under both fasting and fed conditions. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios comparing the test and reference formulations for the peak concentration (Cmax), the area under the curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between the test and reference formulation in healthy individuals was confirmed under both fasting and fed states, meeting regulatory standards set for the study. Both drug formulations demonstrated safety and tolerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.