SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2025
A scoping review of knowledge, attitudes, and practices in swine farm biosecurity in North America.
Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Swine Enteric Coronaviruses: An Updated Overview of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Prevention, and Control.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward African swine fever among commercial pig farm producers in Takeo and Kampong Speu provinces, Cambodia.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Barriers and Breakthroughs in U.S. Swine Biosecurity: A Key Informant Exploration of the Role of Human Behavior in Enhanced Biosecurity Compliance.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Education and Economic Factors Shape Clusters of Biosecurity Beliefs and Practices: Insights from an Exploratory Survey of Midwest U.S. Swine Producers.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Beliefs, Behaviors, and Practices of Farm Biosecurity in the Midwestern U.S. Swine Operations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pork is one of the most popular consumer meat choices globally, second to poultry. In the past two decades, the rising demand in pork, has seen pig farming move toward intensive farming methods, characterized by high pig densities which is a risk for swift spread of disease necessitating proper and strict biosecurity adherence to facilitate disease-free conditions and business continuity. North America is the second largest pig producer globally. We conducted a review of available peer-reviewed original publications to scope for available data on the knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and practices concerning biosecurity among swine producers in North America from the year 2011 to 2022 using the PRISMA-SCr guidelines. Out of the 323 papers that fit our search criteria, we present insights from the 18 papers that were relevant to our study. We summarize key findings on biosecurity practices and propose critical practices for biosecurity adherence. We also present our findings on the complexities that influence producers' adoption of biosecurity plans and note variations in biosecurity strictness between states and how these are influenced by farm size and perceived disease risk. In conclusion, this review highlights the need for updated assessments of biosecurity practices, leveraging technology particularly machine learning, for risk assessment, and acknowledges the role that demographics and risk perception play in biosecurity adoption. Ultimately, effective biosecurity measures are imperative for safeguarding North American swine production systems against disease threats especially foreign animal diseases like the African swine fever (ASF), foot and mouth disease (FMD) and classical swine fever.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.