Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098891›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2025

A scoping review of knowledge, attitudes, and practices in swine farm biosecurity in North America.

Maurine C Chepkwony, Dennis N Makau, Colin Yoder, Cesar Corzo, Marie Culhane, Andres Perez, Maria Sol Perez Aguirreburualde, André J Nault, Michael Mahero

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maurine C ChepkwonyCenter for Animal Health and Food Safety, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Dennis N MakauDepartment of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Colin YoderCenter for Animal Health and Food Safety, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Cesar CorzoDepartment of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Marie CulhaneDepartment of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Andres PerezCenter for Animal Health and Food Safety, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Maria Sol Perez AguirreburualdeCenter for Animal Health and Food Safety, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
André J NaultHealth Science Libraries, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Michael MaheroCenter for Animal Health and Food Safety, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pork is one of the most popular consumer meat choices globally, second to poultry. In the past two decades, the rising demand in pork, has seen pig farming move toward intensive farming methods, characterized by high pig densities which is a risk for swift spread of disease necessitating proper and strict biosecurity adherence to facilitate disease-free conditions and business continuity. North America is the second largest pig producer globally. We conducted a review of available peer-reviewed original publications to scope for available data on the knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and practices concerning biosecurity among swine producers in North America from the year 2011 to 2022 using the PRISMA-SCr guidelines. Out of the 323 papers that fit our search criteria, we present insights from the 18 papers that were relevant to our study. We summarize key findings on biosecurity practices and propose critical practices for biosecurity adherence. We also present our findings on the complexities that influence producers' adoption of biosecurity plans and note variations in biosecurity strictness between states and how these are influenced by farm size and perceived disease risk. In conclusion, this review highlights the need for updated assessments of biosecurity practices, leveraging technology particularly machine learning, for risk assessment, and acknowledges the role that demographics and risk perception play in biosecurity adoption. Ultimately, effective biosecurity measures are imperative for safeguarding North American swine production systems against disease threats especially foreign animal diseases like the African swine fever (ASF), foot and mouth disease (FMD) and classical swine fever.

Indexed as

biosecurity adoptioncritical biosecurity practicesforeign animal disease (FAD)knowledge – attitude – practiceNorth American pig farmingrisk assessmentswine biosecurity

Identifiers

PMID40098891
PMCPMC11911468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.