ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2025
Community Awareness of Lung Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Screening Practices for Lung Cancer in Uzbekistan: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- Awareness of lung cancer screening among smokers: a Lebanese experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States, but only 4.5% of eligible people undergo recommended screening. We hypothesize that low community awareness remains a barrier to lung cancer screening. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in a convenience sample of attendees at our institution's community health fair. Survey topics included demographics, smoking history, cancer history, lung cancer screening knowledge, and perceptions of screening risks and benefits. Results: Of 214 survey participants, 139 (65%) were women, and there were 98 (46%) Asian and 86 (40%) White participants. Almost a third of the sample had worked in health care, and just more than a half had completed some graduate school. There were only 6 (2.8%) current smokers and 28 (13%) former smokers. Most participants (71%) did not know there was a way to screen for lung cancer. Most participants (66%) knew that cigarette smoking was the risk factor considered for lung cancer screening, but very few knew the screening criteria. More than 75% of participants chose "strongly agree" or "agree" that several benefits of lung cancer screening are important to consider, but only 50.0% to 66.3% for several risks. Most participants (71%) responded that they are "very likely" or "likely" to undergo screening if eligible. Conclusions: In a survey study at a community health fair, community awareness of lung cancer screening was very low, but most participants said they would be willing to be screened if eligible. Community education is critical in increasing our lung cancer screening rates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.