Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098779›Full record

ArticleJournal of child & adolescent trauma2025

ACE Enquiry in Primary care: A Qualitative Exploration of the Perspective of General Practitioners in Northern Ireland.

Rafael Smyth, Dominic McSherry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child & adolescent trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rafael SmythSchool of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
Dominic McSherryReader in Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sought to identify gaps in the current literature base by exploring the perspectives of General Practitioners (GPs) in Northern Ireland in relation to the significance, relevance, and feasibility of conducting a comprehensive inquiry into Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) with patients. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 qualified GPs using Zoom Videoconferencing technology. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative data was analysed using Theoretical Thematic Analysis (Braun & Clarke Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2):77-101, 2006). Analysis revealed nine key superordinate themes. These themes encompassed various aspects such as the role of a GP, trauma-informed training, the advantages and barriers associated with conducting an ACE assessment, and the impact of childhood adversity on subsequent physical and mental health. This study provides valuable primary care professional insights that contribute to the existing evidence base. It highlights the importance of recognising, discussing, and screening for ACEs in primary care settings. Furthermore, this study explores a range of practical adjustments that could support the implementation of routine ACE enquiry within the primary healthcare system in Northern Ireland.

Indexed as

ACEGeneral practicePrimary careTrauma

Identifiers

PMID40098779
PMCPMC11910462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.