ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Comparing Body Contouring Surgery Outcomes Inpatient Versus Outpatient in an Appalachian Tristate Population.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Technical Evolution with Intramuscular Gluteal Filling: A 15-year Cohort, 5.081 Procedures, and Creation of Advanced Gluteal Modeling (MAG).Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Body contouring surgery is becoming increasingly popular. Many patients desire aesthetic improvement, but many also desire functional improvement after significant weight loss. Furthermore, there are few studies which analyze whether these patients need to be admitted postoperatively. We seek to evaluate whether outpatient surgery for body contouring surgery has any impact on outcomes and readmission rates in an Appalachian population. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective chart review of 370 patients from January 2010 to December 2023 age 18 years and older who underwent body contouring surgery at an Appalachian tertiary academic center. It was first noted what surgery the patient underwent and whether the patient was admitted postoperatively. Then, outcomes and complications within 90 days were noted. These included unexpected admission/readmission, infection, seroma/hematoma formation, wound separation, incision necrosis, venous thromboembolism, and mortality. We also examined rates of unexpected reoperation 1 year postoperatively. Statistical analysis was then performed. Results: There were 264 remaining patients who underwent outpatient surgery and 90 patients who underwent inpatient surgery. In regard to infection, seroma/hematoma formation, wound separation, incision necrosis, venous thromboembolism, and mortality, there was no statistical difference between inpatient or outpatient surgery. There was a statistically significant decreased risk in readmission for breast reduction when performed outpatient (odds ratio = 0.0519, Conclusions: Outpatient body contouring surgery is a safe and effective option for those in rural Appalachia and should be considered whenever possible.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.