Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098753›Full record

ArticleQuantum machine intelligence2025

Unsupervised beyond-standard-model event discovery at the LHC with a novel quantum autoencoder.

Callum Duffy, Mohammad Hassanshahi, Marcin Jastrzebski, Sarah Malik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantum machine intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Callum DuffyPhysics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower St, London, WC1E 6BT UK.
Mohammad Hassanshahi *Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower St, London, WC1E 6BT UK.
Marcin Jastrzebski *Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower St, London, WC1E 6BT UK.
Sarah Malik *Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower St, London, WC1E 6BT UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the potential of unsupervised anomaly detection for identifying physics beyond the standard model that may appear at proton collisions at the Large Hadron Collider. We introduce a novel quantum autoencoder circuit ansatz that is specifically designed for this task and demonstrates superior performance compared to previous approaches. To assess its robustness, we evaluate the quantum autoencoder on various types of new physics 'signal' events and varying problem sizes. Additionally, we develop classical autoencoders that outperform previously proposed quantum autoencoders but remain outpaced by the new quantum ansatz, despite its significantly reduced number of trainable parameters. Finally, we investigate the properties of quantum autoencoder circuits, focusing on entanglement and magic. We introduce a novel metric in the context of parameterised quantum circuits, stabiliser 2-Rényi entropy to quantify magic, along with the previously studied Meyer-Wallach measure for entanglement. Intriguingly, both metrics decreased throughout the training process along with the decrease in the loss function. This appears to suggest that models preferentially learn parameters that reduce (but not minimise) these metrics. This study highlights the potential utility of quantum autoencoders in searching for physics beyond the standard model at the Large Hadron Collider and opens exciting avenues for further research into the role of entanglement and magic in quantum machine learning more generally.

Indexed as

Anomaly detectionEntanglement entropyHigh-energy physicsMagicQuantum autoencoder

Identifiers

PMID40098753
PMCPMC11910424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.