ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Prognostic impact of visceral and subcutaneous fat area in stage I-III colon cancer patients with cachexia: a population-based multicenter study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adipose tissue reduction is one of the features in patients with cancer cachexia. However, it remains unclear whether visceral fat area (VFA) and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) contribute differently to the progression of cancer cachexia in colon cancer patients. This study aims to investigate the prognostic impact of VFA and SFA in stage I-III colon cancer patients with cachexia. Methods: Patients diagnosed with stage I-III colon cancer were preoperatively measured for VFA and SFA and then divided into VFA-high (VFA-H) and VFA-low (VFA-L) groups, as well as SFA-high (SFA-H) and SFA-low (SFA-L) groups. The prognostic impact of VFA and SFA for colon cancer patients with cachexia were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Results: A total of 916 colon cancer patients (377 with cachexia and 539 without) were included in the study. In patients with cachexia, the estimated five-year overall survival (OS) was higher in the VFA-H group compared to the VFA-L group ( Conclusion: Preoperative VFA, but not SFA was a useful prognostic factor for long-term outcomes in stage I-III colon cancer patients with cachexia. More attention should be paid to VFA in colon cancer patients with cachexia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.