ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025
Long-term exposure to ambient PM
Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Small extracellular vesicles: connecting early life exposure outcomes to air pollution during pregnancy to early childhood health.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2025Pooled it
- Association between PMBMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cohort studies have reported positive associations between long-term exposure to ambient fine particles (PM Methods: We used an open population-based cohort created from health administrative databases. The cohort included all adults older than 20 years living in the province of Quebec, Canada, between 2002 and 2017. We assessed long-term exposure to ambient PM Results: The cohort included 7,506,027 individuals, with 996,665 and 231,376 deaths from all causes and IHD, respectively. In the between-subjects analysis, hazard ratios from linear models were 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02, 1.03) for all-cause and 1.04 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.05) for IHD per interquartile range (3.3 µg/m Conclusions: Consistently across the two designs, we found positive associations between annual mean exposure to low level of ambient PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.