Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098707›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Low incidence of significant hydrogel spacer rectal wall infiltration: results from an experienced high-volume center.

Sungmin Woo, Anton S Becker, Aaron E Katz, Angela Tong, Hebert A Vargas, David J Byun, Jonathan W Lischalk, Jonathan A Haas, Michael J Zelefsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sungmin WooDepartment of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Anton S BeckerDepartment of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Aaron E KatzDepartment of Urology, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, United States.
Angela TongDepartment of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Hebert A VargasDepartment of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
David J ByunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Jonathan W LischalkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, New York, NY, United States.
Jonathan A HaasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States.
Michael J ZelefskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the incidence and degree of rectal wall infiltration (RWI) of spacer gel used during prostate radiotherapy among two practitioners experienced in using rectal spacers. Materials and methods: Consecutive patients with prostate cancer who received prostate radiotherapy after hydrogel rectal spacer insertion in August 2023-August 2024 by two experienced practitioners were retrospectively included. Post-implant magnetic resonance imaging examinations were evaluated by two radiologists for RWI: 0 (no abnormality), 1 (rectal wall edema), 2 (superficial RWI), and 3 (deep RWI). Scores 2-3 were considered positive for RWI and their location and degree of RWI (radial, longitudinal, and circumferential) were also categorized. Inter-reader agreement was assessed with Cohen's Kappa. Results: 215 men were included. Agreement was substantial between the radiologists for RWI scores (Kappa, 0.697; 95% confidence interval, 0.594-0.800). RWI scores were 0 in 80.5% (173/215), 1 in 7.9% (17/215), 2 in 10.7% (23/215), and, 3 in 0.9% (2/215) of the men. Altogether, RWI was present (scores 2-3) in 11.6% (25/215), most commonly in the mid-gland and apex with median radial, longitudinal, and circumferential involvement of 3.2 mm, 8.6 mm, and 11.5%. None of these patients demonstrated any significant rectal toxicity. Conclusion: RWI was very uncommon for experienced practitioners. The degree of RWI was focal and not associated with increased complications.

Indexed as

hydrogelmagnetic resonance imagingradiotherapyrectal wall infiltrationspacer

Identifiers

PMID40098707
PMCPMC11911376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.