ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Differences in lower limb co-contraction calculations vary clinical interpretation of aquatic treadmill walking in typically developing and children with cerebral palsy.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation improves postural stability under virtual reality perturbation by enhancing vestibular processing and multisensory integration.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of co-contraction indices using synthetic EMG data: Implications for selection and interpretation.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The purposes of this study were to (1) investigate muscle co-contraction during aquatic (Wet) and conventional (Dry) treadmill walking at various speeds in typically developing (TD) and children with cerebral palsy (CP) and (2) explore how the clinical interpretation of co-contraction, using co-contraction indices (CCI), may vary depending on the method employed. Methods: Fifteen TD children (30 limbs, 7 M | 8F, 11.3 ± 4.1 yrs., 1.46 ± 0.18 m, 44.2 ± 16.8 kg) and 10 children with CP (20 limbs, 6 M | 4F, 13.1 ± 3.5 yrs., 1.54 ± 0.18 m, 53.2 ± 26.2 kg, 7 GMFCS I and 3 II) participated in this study. Muscle activity of the tibialis anterior (TA), rectus femoris (RF), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and semitendinosus (ST) was recorded during three 3-min walking trials on a Dry treadmill followed by a Wet treadmill. Muscle co-contraction was calculated using three common CCI calculation methods for the RF/ST and TA/MG muscle pairings. Separate linear mixed-effects models examined the influence of population (TD vs. CP), walking speed (Slow, Normal, Fast), and treadmill environment (Dry vs. Wet) on CCI for each equation and muscle pairing. Results: CCI Conclusion: This study shows the potential of aquatic treadmill walking to reduce muscle co-contraction; however, caution is recommended as clinical implications can vary due to the computation method. Future studies should aim to report values from multiple methods to account for the variability within methods and validation of results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.