ReviewRevista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia)2023
[Epidemiológical surveillance systems in the working environment: a perspective in Latin American countries].
Review in Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Through a review of scientific articles, information was identified on the implementation of Epidemiological Surveillance Systems (EVS) managed by employers within the framework of Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems (SG-SST) in Colombia and Latin America between 2010. and 2021. PubMed, Science Direct, SciELO, Scopus, Dialnet, and Gale databases were used to identify research that used employer-implemented EVS data. The topics covered, economic sectors, publication dates, countries of origin, populations studied, scope and quality parameters were described. It was evident that only 3 studies used EVS information derived from SG-SST to monitor workers' exposure to epidemiological risks and prevent occupational diseases and accidents. Of the 24 studies examined, 21 did not use EVS information, being considered negative findings. The lack of adherence to standards, the lack of EVS, the lack of knowledge of different instances of EVS and the absence of adequate studies result in poor coverage of workers exposed to occupational risks. Most studies highlight the need for EVS in the workplace. They also highlight the importance of generating massive, systematic, reliable and comparable data from primary sources such as companies and productive units to support public policies that guarantee the social security and health of workers. Given this reality and the few studies cited, it is concluded that the situation of workers in the region is neither known nor adequately supported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.