Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098633›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

An efficient deep learning strategy for accurate and automated detection of breast tumors in ultrasound image datasets.

Luyao Li, Yupeng Niu, Fa Tian, Bin Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luyao LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Yupeng NiuCollege of Information Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya' an, China.
Fa TianCollege of Information Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya' an, China.
Bin HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer ranks as one of the leading malignant tumors among women worldwide in terms of incidence and mortality. Ultrasound examination is a critical method for breast cancer screening and diagnosis in China. However, conventional breast ultrasound examinations are time-consuming and labor-intensive, necessitating the development of automated and efficient detection models. Methods: We developed a novel approach based on an improved deep learning model for the intelligent auxiliary diagnosis of breast tumors. Combining an optimized U2NET-Lite model with the efficient DeepCardinal-50 model, this method demonstrates superior accuracy and efficiency in the precise segmentation and classification of breast ultrasound images compared to traditional deep learning models such as ResNet and AlexNet. Results: Our proposed model demonstrated exceptional performance in experimental test sets. For segmentation, the U2NET-Lite model processed breast cancer images with an accuracy of 0.9702, a recall of 0.7961, and an IoU of 0.7063. In classification, the DeepCardinal-50 model excelled, achieving higher accuracy and AUC values compared to other models. Specifically, ResNet-50 achieved accuracies of 0.78 for benign, 0.67 for malignant, and 0.73 for normal cases, while DeepCardinal-50 achieved 0.76, 0.63, and 0.90 respectively. These results highlight our model's superior capability in breast tumor identification and classification. Conclusion: The automatic detection of benign and malignant breast tumors using deep learning can rapidly and accurately identify breast tumor types at an early stage, which is crucial for the early diagnosis and treatment of malignant breast tumors.

Indexed as

breast cancer detectionDeepCardinal-50deep learningU2NET-Liteultrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID40098633
PMCPMC11911202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.