Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098577›Full record

ArticleDyslexia (Chichester, England)2025

What Are the Research Priorities for the Dyslexia Community in the United Kingdom and How Do They Align With Previous Research Funding?

Catherine Manning, Beverley Jennings, Keren MacLennan, Raveen Rayat, Keith Spiller, Holly Joseph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catherine ManningSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6862-2525
Beverley JenningsInstitute of Education, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Keren MacLennanDepartment of Psychology, University of Durham, Durham, UK.
Raveen RayatSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Keith SpillerDepartment of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Holly JosephInstitute of Education, University of Reading, Reading, UK.

Funding

Research England Participatory Research FundUniversity of Reading
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeting research towards areas that matter to dyslexic people and their families is essential for improving dyslexic people's lives. However, we do not know what the dyslexia community's research priorities are and whether they align with current research funding. We categorised previous funding for dyslexia research in the United Kingdom and considered how this aligns with community research priorities, using multiple methods and a participatory approach. We identified that the vast majority (78%) of funding has been spent on research into biology, brain and cognition. Through seven focus groups (n = 37), dyslexic adults and/or family members/carers of dyslexic children expressed that this balance needs redressing, and we identified four important areas for future research, informed by lived experiences. Finally, 436 members of the dyslexia community ranked the importance of research topics in a survey. The top five priorities related to training teachers and professionals, educational supports and interventions, mental health and self-esteem, making services and spaces more inclusive and cognition. Research into genes and risk factors was less prioritised. These results provide a point of reference for researchers and funders to align future research funding with the dyslexia community's priorities so that it can be of translational benefit.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDyslexiaResearchResearch Support as TopicAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40098577
PMCPMC11933878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.