Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098573›Full record

ArticleAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2025

Assessment of Intraepithelial Lymphocytes Count in Potential Celiac Disease.

Roberta Mandile, Mariantonia Maglio, Antonella Marano, Luciano Rapacciuolo, Valentina Discepolo, Riccardo Troncone, Renata Auricchio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roberta MandileEuropean Laboratory for the Investigation of Food Induced Diseases (ELFID) University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Mariantonia MaglioEuropean Laboratory for the Investigation of Food Induced Diseases (ELFID) University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9430-3779
Antonella MaranoEuropean Laboratory for the Investigation of Food Induced Diseases (ELFID) University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Luciano RapacciuoloDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Paediatrics, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Valentina DiscepoloEuropean Laboratory for the Investigation of Food Induced Diseases (ELFID) University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Riccardo TronconeEuropean Laboratory for the Investigation of Food Induced Diseases (ELFID) University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Renata AuricchioEuropean Laboratory for the Investigation of Food Induced Diseases (ELFID) University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Funding

Fondazione Celiachia Onlus 002_FC_2019Italian Ministry of University and Research CUPItalian Ministry of University and Research E63C22002030007Italian Ministry of University and Research PE00000003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) count, central for coeliac disease (CD) diagnosis, can be performed either directly on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained paraffined sections or on optimal-cutting-temperature-compound (OCT)-embedded frozen sections stained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with anti-CD3. We evaluated the concordance in Marsh grading between these two techniques on a large sample of sections. A total of 280 patients with a normal intestinal architecture, 210 potential celiac disease (PCD) patients, and 70 controls (CTR) were included. At the H&E histological evaluation, 136/280 were classified as Marsh-0 (showing < 25 IELs/100 enterocytes) and 144 Marsh-1, while at the IHC evaluation, 191 were classified as Marsh-0 (showing ≤ 34 CD3+/mm of epithelium) and 89 Marsh-1. The overall concordance was 66.8% (48.6% Marsh-1 and 86% Marsh-0) with a Cohen Kappa value of 0.33. In the PCD group, the overall concordance was 63% (45.6% Marsh-1 and 84% Marsh-0) with a Cohen Kappa value of 0.26, while in the CTR group it was 77% (60% Marsh-1, 90% Marsh-0) with a Cohen Kappa value of 0.54. Differences between the two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the concordance of IELs counts between histological and IHC evaluation is low (Kappa Cohen 0.54) in no-CD and even more in PCD patients (0.26). Caution must be paid when classifying a patient as Marsh-0 or Marsh-1 according to the technique used.

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseIntraepithelial LymphocytesAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryIntestinal MucosaLymphocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdulthistologyIELsimmunohistochemistryMarsh 0Marsh 1

Identifiers

PMID40098573
PMCPMC11914950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.