Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098497›Full record

ArticleMilitary medicine2025

Empathy Training Seminar in the Military Health System: A Qualitative Self-Assessment Pilot Study.

Joseph Basi, Nicole Cornish, Christopher Spevak, M Jennifer Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph BasiGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 20057, USA.
Nicole CornishGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 20057, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3998-3219
Christopher SpevakGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 20057, USA.
M Jennifer ChengClinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmpathy and compassion are critical aspects of quality patient care. However, empathy is currently underrepresented in medical education. Currently, no guidelines exist for integrating empathy training into medical schools or residency programs. The goal of this study was to pilot a workshop for medical students, residents, and fellows designed to enhance functional empathy skills and awareness. The relationship between physician empathy and improved patient outcomes is well-documented in the literature and is not the focus of this manuscript. This study concentrates on the development of new empathy training and its integration into the medical curriculum. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe participants were medical students, residents, and fellows who rotated through the Walter Reed Pain Clinic. All participants attended a 1-h virtual workshop via an online platform focused on empathy. The workshop was composed of preparatory reading materials, a simulation video, and a case discussion led by three facilitators. This workshop occurred once a month and each rotation included a different set of attendees. A total of 13 monthly seminars were run from May 2023 to August 2024. The impact of this activity was measured with a series of three surveys, which asked learners to directly assess the efficacy of the workshop and to self-evaluate their competencies in key areas. There was a pre-workshop survey to establish a baseline for participants' empathy self-assessments, an immediate post-workshop survey with an aim to measure the perceived quality of the curriculum, and a 1-month check-in designed to measure if the workshop improved participants' self-assessed empathy skills.

resultsThe primary outcome was the change in participants' self-assessed empathy 1 month after the workshop. Data from the 1-month follow up demonstrate that there was significant improvement in self-assessments of empathy by learners after the workshop. The secondary outcome was the participant analysis of the workshop curriculum. A total of 94% of participants indicated they would recommend the workshop to their colleagues. In all, 76% of participants indicated they will be changing the way they practice because of the workshop. In all, 31% of participants reported one or more actionable empathetic behaviors they plan to work on as a direct result of the workshop.

conclusionThe findings from this study suggest that the empathy workshop can enhance medical learners' ability to practice empathy and compassion in clinical settings. The 1-month follow-up survey demonstrated significant improvements in self-assessed empathy and comments from learners supported the efficacy of the workshop. Future studies can reduce bias by utilizing a larger participant population across multiple specialties, a longer follow-up period, and patient-centered outcomes. Continuing to pursue a more advanced empathy curriculum is critical given the previously established link between empathy and improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

EducationEmpathyMilitary MedicineAdultCurriculumEducation, MedicalFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMalePilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchSelf-AssessmentStudents, MedicalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40098497
PMCPMC13396131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.