ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Visualized hysteroscopic artificial intelligence fertility assessment system for endometrial injury: an image-deep-learning study.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05381376 (Multicentre Prospective Clinical Database for the Construction of Predictive Models on Risk of Intrauterine Adhesion), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicentre Prospective Clinical Database for the Construction of Predictive Models on Risk of Intrauterine Adhesion
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, and Computer Vision in Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Investigating discrepancies in accuracy, agreement and interpretability for single-frame embryo classification tasks conducted by embryologists and deep learning models.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Hysteroscopy: A Multicentric Study on Automated Classification of Pleomorphic Lesions.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAsherman's syndrome (AS) is a significant cause of subfertility in women from developing countries. Over 80% of AS cases in these regions are linked to dilation and curettage (D&C) procedures following pregnancy. The incidence of AS in patients with infertility and recurrent miscarriage can be as high as 10%, while the pregnancy rate in cases of moderate to severe adhesions can be as low as 34%. We aimed to establish a hysteroscopic artificial intelligence system using image-deep-learning algorithms for fertility assessment.
methodsThis diagnostic study included 555 cases with 4922 hysteroscopic images from a Chinese intrauterine adhesions cohort clinical database (NCT05381376). The study evaluated two image-deep-learning algorithms' effectiveness in predicting pregnancy within one year, using AUCs and decision curve analysis. The models' performance was evaluated for two-year prediction
resultsThe proportional hazard CNN system accurately predicted conception, with AUCs of 0.982, 0.992, and 0.990 in three randomly assigned datasets, superior to the InceptionV3 framework, and achieved a net benefit of 69.4% for subfertility assessment. The system fitted well with c-indexes of 0.920-0.940 and was time-stable. The quantifiable visualization panel displayed four intrauterine pathologies intuitively. The performance was comparable to senior hysteroscopists, with a kappa value of 0.84-0.89.
conclusionsThe CNN based on the proportional hazard approach accurately assesses fertility postoperatively. The quantifiable visualization panel could assist in intrauterine pathologies assessment, optimize treatment strategies, and achieve individualized and cost-efficient practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.