Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098208›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2025

Inhalation anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) regimens in patients with obesity: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Sabrina Soledad Domene, Daniela Fulginiti, Antonia Thompson, Vanessa P Salolin Vargas, Laura C Rodriguez, Meraris D Tolentino Colón, Mariela D Fermin Madera, Juan N Layton, María I Peña Encarnación, Victor S Arruarana and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sabrina Soledad Domene *Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata, Argentina.
Daniela Fulginiti *Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Antonia ThompsonStevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, USA.
Vanessa P Salolin VargasFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Westhill, Mexico City, Mexico.
Laura C RodriguezUniversidad de Oriente, Nucleo Bolivar, Bolivar, Venezuela.
Meraris D Tolentino ColónUniversidad Iberoamericana (UNIBE), Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Mariela D Fermin MaderaInstituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo (INTEC), Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Juan N LaytonUniversidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia.
María I Peña EncarnaciónInstituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo (INTEC), Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Victor S ArruaranaBrookdale University Hospital Medical Center, New York, USA.
Camila Sanchez CruzUniversidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico. c.camilasc1@gmail.com.
Ernesto Calderon-MartínezUniversidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico. Ernestocalderon.mtz@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is a global epidemic, projected to affect 4 billion people by 2035. Anesthesia regimens, including volatile anesthetics and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), impact postoperative outcomes, particularly in obese patients who face increased risks of complications. Volatile anesthetics are often associated with higher rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), while TIVA may improve recovery but can increase costs and present additional challenges. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the effects of these anesthesia methods on perioperative outcomes, including hemodynamic stability, recovery, and PONV, in this high-risk population.

methodsAdhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024547776) studies were identified through PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, CINDAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted.

resultsThirteen studies with 1072 participants were included. Inhalational anesthesia significantly increases PONV (RR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.21-3.60; p = 0.01; I

conclusionTIVA appears to improve perioperative outcomes in obese patients by reducing PONV and intraoperative heart rate, highlighting its potential advantages in clinical practice. Further research is needed to address variability and establish evidence-based guidelines for anesthesia management in this high-risk population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER IN PROSPERO: CRD42024547776.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaInhalational anesthesiaIntraoperative vital signsObesityPostoperative nausea and vomitingTotal intravenous

Identifiers

PMID40098208
PMCPMC11917146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.