ArticlePatient safety in surgery2025
Nocturnal elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery is not associated with increased one-year mortality.
Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgeries are increasingly scheduled during nighttime or after-hours. This poses unique challenges, such as reduced staffing, disrupted circadian rhythms, and increased fatigue, which may potentially affect outcomes. Despite growing evidence on the impact of daytime on cardiac surgery outcome, results remain inconclusive. The current study aims to investigate a potential association between surgery timing (daytime: 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM vs. nighttime: 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM) and long-term survival in patients undergoing elective CABG.
methodsIn this retrospective single-institution cohort study at the University Clinic Salzburg, Austria, we analyzed elective CABG surgeries performed between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. The primary hypothesis was that nighttime elective CABG surgeries have worse long-term survival. Among 2,179 cardiac surgical procedures, 723 elective CABG surgeries were identified and analyzed. Long-term survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazard modeling, while secondary outcomes, including 30-day and one-year mortality rates, were evaluated through multiple linear regression analysis.
resultsThe one-year mortality rate was 2.6% (n = 19) for the observation period. Of the 723 patients, 646 (89.35%) underwent daytime surgery, and 77 (10.65%) had nighttime surgery. The median EuroScore II was 1.50 [1.00, 2.60] for daytime surgeries and 1.70 [1.10, 3.10] for nighttime surgeries (p = 0.111). There was no association between nighttime surgery and long-term mortality (aHR: 1.624, 95% CI: 0.589 to 3.662, p = 0.3179). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed that nighttime surgeries were not significantly associated with increased one-year mortality (aOR: 1.089, 95% CI: 0.208 to 3.711, p = 0.905). No deaths occurred within 30 days in either group.
conclusionThis analysis found no significant association between nocturnal elective CABG operations and increased long-term or one-year mortality. This study did not aim to evaluate the economics of nocturnal surgeries at the investigated institution. To confirm our results that there is no increased morbidity and mortality associated with nocturnal CABG operations, and to understand the economic impact of nocturnal surgeries, prospective randomized studies would be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.