ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2025
Effect of end-expiratory carbon dioxide monitoring on painless colonoscopy procedures in obstructive sleep apnea patients.
Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current and Emerging Sedation Practices for Colonoscopy: A Narrative Review of Pharmacological Agents, High-Risk Populations, and Safety Considerations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCarbon dioxide (CO2) accumulation during prolonged painless colonoscopy procedures in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) can lead to an increased incidence of various complications. The disposable end-expiratory CO2 device monitors the respiratory function and CO2 elimination of patients in real time, providing timely feedback to physicians. This enhances the safety and success of the procedure and improves the overall medical experience for the patient.
methodA total of 158 patients with OSAS underwent colonoscopy and were divided into two groups. The study group received end-expiratory CO
resultThe study group exhibited a lower incidence of hypoxemia and higher utilization of upper airway ventilation devices, resulting in greater postoperative satisfaction (P = 0.019, P = 0.002, P < 0.001, respectively). Conversely, the control group experienced a higher incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting as well as abdominal pain and abdominal distension (P = 0.006, P = 0.038, P < 0.012).
conclusionEmploying disposable end-expiratory CO TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2400083702; Registration date: April 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.