ArticleGenome biology2025
Multi-task benchmarking of spatially resolved gene expression simulation models.
Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- BEASTsim-a benchmarking and analysis platform for spatial transcriptomics simulations.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Large Language Models for Accessible Reporting of Bioinformatics Analyses in Interdisciplinary Contexts.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Multi-task benchmarking of spatially resolved gene expression simulation models.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComputational methods for spatially resolved transcriptomics (SRT) are often developed and assessed using simulated data. The effectiveness of these evaluations relies on the ability of simulation methods to accurately reflect experimental data. However, a systematic evaluation framework for spatial simulators is currently lacking.
resultsHere, we present SpatialSimBench, a comprehensive evaluation framework that assesses 13 simulation methods using ten distinct STR datasets. We introduce simAdaptor, a tool that extends single-cell simulators by incorporating spatial variables, enabling them to simulate spatial data. SimAdaptor ensures SpatialSimBench is backwards compatible, facilitating direct comparisons between spatially aware simulators and existing non-spatial single-cell simulators through the adaption. Using SpatialSimBench, we demonstrate the feasibility of leveraging existing single-cell simulators for SRT data and highlight performance differences among methods. Additionally, we evaluate the simulation methods based on a total of 35 metrics across data property estimation, various downstream analyses, and scalability. In total, we generated 4550 results from 13 simulation methods, ten spatial datasets, and 35 metrics.
conclusionsOur findings reveal that model estimation can be influenced by distribution assumptions and dataset characteristics. In summary, our evaluation framework provides guidelines for selecting appropriate methods for specific scenarios and informs future method development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.