Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098163›Full record

ReviewInflammation and regeneration2025

Neural repair mechanisms after ischemic stroke.

Koshi Irisa, Takashi Shichita

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Inflammation and regeneration, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Koshi IrisaDepartment of Neuroinflammation and Repair, Medical Research Laboratory, Institute of Science Tokyo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan. irisa.koshi@tmd.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2180-772X
Takashi ShichitaDepartment of Neuroinflammation and Repair, Medical Research Laboratory, Institute of Science Tokyo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic stroke triggers inflammation that promotes neuronal injury, leading to disruption of neural circuits and exacerbated neurological deficits in patients. Immune cells contribute to not only the acute inflammatory responses but also the chronic neural repair. During the post-stroke recovery, reparative immune cells support the neural circuit reorganization that occurs around the infarct region to connect broad brain areas. This review highlights the time-dependent changes of neuro-immune interactions and reorganization of neural circuits after ischemic brain injury. Understanding the molecular mechanisms involving immune cells in acute inflammation, subsequent neural repair, and neuronal circuit reorganization that compensate for the lost brain function is indispensable to establish treatment strategies for stroke patients.

Indexed as

InflammationIschemic brain injuryNeural circuit reorganizationNeural repairReparative immune cells

Identifiers

PMID40098163
PMCPMC11912631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.