ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025
Microbial composition on microplastics mediated by stream impairment.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies into biofilm interactions with microplastic polymers in marine environments are widespread in the literature. Increasing evidence suggests that lotic microplastics are a significant contributor and may accumulate harmful or pathogenic organisms, thereby contributing to the degradation of marine ecosystems where they meet riverine systems. Suboptimal water quality of these riverine systems may influence these biomes. This project compared the microbial diversity of biofilms that developed on microplastics to natural stone substrates in an impaired and unimpaired section of the Quinnipiac River Watershed. In this project, the influence of impairment was studied based on microbial diversity via 16S rRNA gene sequencing while monitoring total colony and fecal coliform colony counts using standard water sampling methods.
resultsTotal coliform colony counts were greater in the impaired Quinnipiac River site than in the unimpaired Honeypot Brook tributary and on the microplastic substrate than the stone substrate. Sequenced features to the class level were dominated by Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, and Gammaproteobacteria, comprising 75% of the community biome. Simpson's Diversity indices indicated that within the two substrates, there was little variation between the communities. However, it was noted that microplastic alpha diversity trended slightly lower than the stone. Further analysis of common aquatic enteropathogens showed that the genus Citrobacter was significantly more abundant on the microplastics at both locations.
conclusionsOur results indicate impaired waterbodies with a microplastic burden may retain greater fecal coliform bacterial loads than unimpaired waterbodies. Increased microplastic loads in compromised lotic systems may have an additive impact. Water quality remediation and careful monitoring are recommended to reduce this effect. Comparing this study with environmental community analysis could provide valuable insight into preferential surface attachment of bacteria onto microplastic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.