ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2025
The global trend of intravenous anesthesia and tumors: a bibliometric and visualized study.
Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThrough bibliometric analysis, this paper summarizes the growing literature and analyses the development trends and hot spots in the research field of the association between intravenous anesthesia and tumors.
methodsA literature overview was conducted using relevant articles retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection published between 1991 and 2024. Bibliometric websites and tools (VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and bibliometric R package) are used to analyze the co-occurrence of keywords and reference citations, detailing countries, institutions, authors, references, journals, and keywords.
resultsA total of 1198 relevant articles were included in the study. The USA, China, and Germany have the largest number of publications, with the USA and China having the most interagency cooperation and Germany relatively less cooperation. The institution that publishes the most articles is the University of National Defense Medical Center, and the journal that publishes the most articles is Anesthesiology. The five most productive authors are Li J., Liu J., Zhang B., Yu X.J., and Xu J. "Surgery", "anaesthesia", and "propofol" are the most common keywords. In recent years, research has focused mainly on intravenous anesthesia and tumor survival.
conclusionBoth Western countries and China have made outstanding contributions to intravenous anesthesia and tumors. In recent years, the number of publications in China has steadily increased, and the quality and influence of these articles deserve recognition. Future research should focus on the key areas of intravenous anesthesia, tumor recurrence, and survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.