ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2025
Molecular evolution of gustatory receptors in the Anopheles gambiae complex.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The sensory biology of mosquito gustation.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026Review
- Contrasting Oviposition Preference Despite Limited Chemosensory Receptor Gene Differentiation in Two Cryptic Anopheles Species.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Population genomics of Plasmodium malariae from 4 African countries.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Early hominin arrival in Southeast Asia triggered the evolution of major human malaria vectors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Genomics of urban adaptation and exaptation in mosquitoes and consequences for vectorial capacity.Current opinion in insect science · 2025Review
- Comparative immunological roles of TEP1 inFrontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMosquitoes in the Anopheles (An.) gambiae species complex are major vectors of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. One reason for this is the high anthropophily of the constituent species An. coluzzii, An. gambiae sensu stricto, and An. arabiensis. In contrast, their sister species An. quadriannulatus is highly zoophilic. Anopheles mosquitoes largely rely on chemical cues for host-seeking, which are primarily detected by four chemosensory gene families: olfactory receptors (Ors), ionotropic receptors (Irs), gustatory receptors (Grs), and odorant binding proteins (Obps). Genes from these families that have been implicated in host adaptation show evidence of positive selection in other insect species, including other mosquitoes. As such, we analyzed the molecular evolutionary patterns of the gustatory receptors within the Anopheles gambiae complex, with a particular interest in identifying Grs that show evidence of positive selection in highly anthropophilic species.
resultsWe identified sixteen Grs that show evidence of potential positive selection using the McDonald-Kreitman test, including four putative sugar receptors and two Grs with unknown ligands that are relatively highly expressed in chemosensory organs of either An. coluzzii or An. quadriannulatus. In addition, we identified twelve Grs that show evidence of potential purifying selection using the McDonald-Kreitman test, and twelve Grs that may have experienced a selective sweep using the DH test, including three putative sugar receptors and the carbon dioxide receptor Gr24. We also identified both positive and purifying selection in the coastal species An. melas (West Africa) and An. merus (East Africa).
conclusionsOur results, together with transcriptomic data, identify four Grs as possible candidates for involvement in the evolution of vertebrate host preference in the An. gambiae complex, as may have occurred in the An. farauti complex. They also point to sugar receptors as playing a role in recent adaptation of some of these species. As the vast majority of Grs have unknown functions and much is still unknown about the role of Grs in these species, a more complete interpretation of our data necessitates further characterization of these genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.