ArticleTrials2025
Efficacy and safety of PCA-assisted continuous paravertebral block in subacute herpes zoster-associated pain: study protocol for a randomized, controlled, double-blind superiority trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPain management for herpes zoster-associated pain (ZAP) is essential to improve patients' daily lives and potentially intervene in the chronicity. Long-lasting, repetitive painful stimuli might lead to central sensitization and neuropathic pain generation. The subacute phase is the main period for ZAP patients to seek medical attention, and it is also a critical treatment time window for the transformation of ZAP to chronic pathological changes. Although there is still a lack of rigorous considerable sample evidence, the pain degree of ZAP and the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) may decrease accordingly with increasing adequate analgesia. Compared to repeated paravertebral nerve block (PVB), patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)-assisted continuous PVB provides more prolonged and comprehensive pain relief according to patient needs. Given this, we intend to test the hypothesis that PCA-assisted continuous PVB delivers a safe and better analgesic effect and reduces PHN incidence in subacute ZAP patients.
methodsA total of 82 eligible subacute herpes zoster (SHZ) patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to the PCA-assisted continuous PVB group (Group PCA) and the repeated PVB group (Group rPVB) at a 1:1 ratio. All enrolled patients will undergo thoracic paravertebral space (TPVS) catheterization and receive similar doses of medication for 7 days. The main intervention factor lies in the different drug administration manners. PCA-assisted continuous PVB treatment will be achieved by pumping, while repeated PVB treatment will be conducted by injecting other therapeutic solutions. The participants and investigators will be both blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome is the VAS scores 1 month after treatment. The secondary outcomes include the incidence of PHN and the adverse events during treatment and follow-up. DISCUSSION: The results from this study will provide clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of PCA-assisted continuous PVB for subacute ZAP patients.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300068158. Registered on 9 February 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.