Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098055›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025

DOST: A consolidated health behavior model that maps factors influencing cancer screening uptake.

Jyoshma Preema Dsouza, Stephan Van den Broucke

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07451340 (Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Questionnaire), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07451340 completednot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Questionnaire (CCSTQ) in Turkish Women

TypeobservationalSponsorAnkara UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled530ConditionsHealthy, Cervical Cancer ScreeningArmsValidity and reliability study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jyoshma Preema DsouzaDepartment of Life Sciences and Medicine (DLSM), Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM), University of Luxembourg, Belval, Esch-sur-Alzette,, Luxembourg. jyoshma.dsouza@uni.lu.
Stephan Van den BrouckeInstitut de Recherche en Sciences Psychologiques (IPSY), Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Ottignies, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where preventive interventions like screening and vaccination face challenges due to limited resources. Despite the availability of user-friendly screening methods, uptake remains poor. Psychological theories are recommended to identify and address determinants of screening participation; however, existing models often focus on a limited range of domains and overlook critical belief-related factors needed to encourage screening uptake. A comprehensive, integrated model addressing these gaps could significantly improve the identification of barriers to screening.

methodsThis conceptual paper proposes a model that maps potential barriers to cancer screening uptake through the lens of beneficiaries. The 'Determinants Of Screening upTake' (DOST) model was systematically developed through a series of steps integrating three existing health behavior theories that have been successfully used previously to improve screening uptake: the Health Belief Model (HBM), the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and the Theory of Care-Seeking Behavior (TCSB).

resultsThe DOST model integrates dimensions represented in existing health behavior models, presenting a detailed map of potential barriers in real world, faced by beneficiaries of screening. These barriers are categorized systematically to enhance understanding and facilitate its use among non-experts in empirical research.

conclusionBy integrating multiple models, the DOST model offers a comprehensive framework that combines theoretical robustness with practical guidelines. It highlights psychosocial barriers that influence screening attitudes, intentions, and uptake. The model can guide the assessment of screening determinants in populations and support the design of educational messages or interventions aimed at increasing screening uptake.

Indexed as

Cancer screening acceptabilityCancer screening barriersHealth behavior model for cancer screeningModels of screening behaviorScreening inequities

Identifiers

PMID40098055
PMCPMC11912733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.