Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40098052›Full record

ReviewJournal of intensive care2025

Gut integrity in intensive care: alterations in host permeability and the microbiome as potential therapeutic targets.

Takehiko Oami, Takashi Shimazui, Tetsuya Yumoto, Shunsuke Otani, Yosuke Hayashi, Craig M Coopersmith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Takehiko OamiDepartment of Surgery and Emory Critical Care Center, Emory University School of Medicine, 101 Woodruff Circle, Suite WMB 5105, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Takashi ShimazuiDepartment of Surgery and Emory Critical Care Center, Emory University School of Medicine, 101 Woodruff Circle, Suite WMB 5105, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Tetsuya YumotoDepartment of Surgery and Emory Critical Care Center, Emory University School of Medicine, 101 Woodruff Circle, Suite WMB 5105, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Shunsuke OtaniDepartment of Surgery and Emory Critical Care Center, Emory University School of Medicine, 101 Woodruff Circle, Suite WMB 5105, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Yosuke HayashiDepartment of Surgery and Emory Critical Care Center, Emory University School of Medicine, 101 Woodruff Circle, Suite WMB 5105, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Craig M CoopersmithDepartment of Surgery and Emory Critical Care Center, Emory University School of Medicine, 101 Woodruff Circle, Suite WMB 5105, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. cmcoop3@emory.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2400-3217

Funding

The Gut as a Target to Improve Outcomes in SepsisR35GM148217 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Craig M Coopersmith · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health GM148217NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gut has long been hypothesized to be the "motor" of critical illness, propagating inflammation and playing a key role in multiple organ dysfunction. However, the exact mechanisms through which impaired gut integrity potentially contribute to worsened clinical outcome remain to be elucidated. Critical elements of gut dysregulation including intestinal hyperpermeability and a perturbed microbiome are now recognized as potential therapeutic targets in critical care. MAIN BODY: The gut is a finely tuned ecosystem comprising ~ 40 trillion microorganisms, a single cell layer intestinal epithelia that separates the host from the microbiome and its products, and the mucosal immune system that actively communicates in a bidirectional manner. Under basal conditions, these elements cooperate to maintain a finely balanced homeostasis benefitting both the host and its internal microbial community. Tight junctions between adjacent epithelial cells selectively transport essential molecules while preventing translocation of pathogens. However, critical illness disrupts gut barrier function leading to increased gut permeability, epithelial apoptosis, and immune activation. This disruption is further exacerbated by a shift in the microbiome toward a "pathobiome" dominated by pathogenic microbes with increased expression of virulence factors, which intensifies systemic inflammation and accelerates organ dysfunction. Research has highlighted several potential therapeutic targets to restore gut integrity in the host, including the regulation of epithelial cell function, modulation of tight junction proteins, and inhibition of epithelial apoptosis. Additionally, microbiome-targeted therapies, such as prebiotics, probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and selective decontamination of the digestive tract have also been extensively investigated to promote restoration of gut homeostasis in critically ill patients. Future research is needed to validate the potential efficacy of these interventions in clinical settings and to determine if the gut can be targeted in an individualized fashion.

conclusionIncreased gut permeability and a disrupted microbiome are common in critical illness, potentially driving dysregulated systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction. Therapeutic strategies to modulate gut permeability and restore the composition of microbiome hold promise as novel treatments for critically ill patients.

Indexed as

BarrierClaudinCritical careDysbiosisIntestineMicrobiotaOccludinPathobiomeSepsisTight junction

Identifiers

PMID40098052
PMCPMC11916345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.