SynthesisScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
Return to work after major trauma: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiology of major work-related injuries in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: a 10-year retrospective study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Unmet Needs for Community-Based Rehabilitation the First 12 Months Postinjury in a Traumatic Brain Injury Population with Moderate-to-Severe Trauma-a Longitudinal Cohort Study.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026Article
- Scoping review of return to work in patients with heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2026Article
- Exploring the implementation of an ICF-based instrument and guideline for interprofessional collaboration in the return-to-work process.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Return to work following traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine without spinal cord injury: a scoping review.Acta orthopaedica · 2026Article
- Experiences of functional recovery after polytrauma in a private Johannesburg healthcare setting: Patients' perspectives.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2026Article
- Evaluating Acute Polytrauma Rehabilitation: A Literature Review With Insights From the UK Major Trauma Network.Cureus · 2025Review
- Return to work 10 years after severe trauma.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Article
- RETURN-TO-WORK AFTER ACETABULAR FRACTURES: THE IMPACT OF INJURY SEVERITY ON THE POST-REHABILITATION WORKING CAPACITY AND WORKLOAD.Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIndividuals suffering from major trauma and survive, often face diverse physical, psychological, and cognitive restrictions which can influence the (health-related) quality of life and the ability to work. Even though, return to work is not necessarily related to the health status of the individual, but it is viewed as a sign of successful reintegration and is a vital parameter of recovery.
objectiveThe aim was to systematically review factors influencing return to work (RTW) after suffering from major trauma. MATERIAL AND
methodsA search on seven databases was performed. The identified publications were selected according to the inclusion criteria: adults (≥ 16 years) who suffered a major trauma (Injury Severity Score ≥ 16) in studies that explored factors associated with RTW. Risk of bias was assessed with the 'Quality in Prognostic studies' tool. Due to reporting quality of the included studies no meta-analysis was performed. Data were clustered, qualitatively analyzed and factors are assessed based on the strength of evidence. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022357649).
results12 studies with 6907 participants (mean age 45 years, 75% males, mean ISS 28) were included. The included studies had low to moderate risk of bias for most domains, the domain 'study confounding' had most often a high risk of bias. Many factors were identified including physical (e.g., injury locations), personal (e.g., age) but also environmental factors (e.g., preinjury income). Only four factors (age, educational level, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and Length of stay (LOS) hospital) are based on moderate or strong evidence. The identified factors reflect the complex interactions within the process of regaining the ability to work after major trauma. DISCUSSION: This systematic review was able to map the evidence surrounding factors affecting RTW after major trauma. Most of the identified factors are currently only based on limited evidence. According to these factors, younger patients with a higher educational level who have a shorter LOS in hospital and a shorter ICU stay might have better chances of RTW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.