ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2025
Foveal crack sign and macular pattern dystrophy.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine if eyes with the foveal crack sign (FCS) in macular pattern dystrophy (MPD) progress to macular holes, and if FCS occurs in the context of hyperreflective foci (HRF) that do not reach the threshold of FCS. PATIENTS AND
methodsA retrospective chart review of eyes with MPD was conducted in the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist medical system. 56 eyes from 32 patients identified as having macular pattern dystrophy were identified. Demographic data were collected from charts and spectral domain optical coherence tomographs (SD-OCTs) were analyzed.
results8 eyes from 6 patients were found to have an FCS-positive OCT at any point at or following their initial diagnosis of MPD. One eye developed a full-thickness stage 4 macular hole during follow-up. There was no significant difference in macular hole development between MPD eyes with and without FCS (p =.1429). There was a significant difference in FCS development between MPD eyes with and without HRF (p =.0063).
conclusionsThe data did not show a significant difference in macular hole generation between eyes with and without FCS, unlike the situation of FCS in eyes post vitrectomy for retinal detachment repair. The significant association between HRF and FCS suggests that the two signs may have a related pathophysiology and may represent different stages in a common degenerative process. Further work is needed to better characterize the relationship of FCS and HRF and to determine if FCS has different implications in the different clinical contexts in which it appears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.