ReviewJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2025
A review of silicosis and other silica-related diseases in the engineered stone countertop processing industry.
Review in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Silicosis from dry-cutting engineered stone in the fabrication of countertops.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026Article
- Artificial stone and silicosis: the Korean experience.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2026Review
- Global research landscape versus disease burden in pneumoconiosis diagnosis: a dual-source bibliometric analysis [1999-2025].Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Serum Prolidase as a Biomarker and the Effects of Nintedanib in an Experimental Rat Model of Silicosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Splenic silicosis, a rare extrapulmonary manifestation of occupational silica exposure: A case report.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Experimentally recreated workplace environments contain submicron crystalline silica particles, including ultrafine particles, which have been identified in the mediastinal lymph nodes of construction workers.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2026Article
- Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Silicosis: A Systematic Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Combined Role of Silanols and Oxidative Stress in Determining Engineered Stone Dust Toxicity.ACS organic & inorganic Au · 2026Article
- Silicosis Diagnosed Using Transbronchial Lung Biopsy: The Pivotal Role of Occupational History.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Backpropagation Neural Network-Based Prediction Model of Marble Surface Quality Cut by Diamond Wire Saw.Micromachines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEngineered stone (ES), a material that has become widespread for its use in kitchen and bathroom countertops since the 1980s, is composed of over 90% crystalline silica by weight, significantly exceeding the silica content of natural stones such as granite (40-50%) and marble (< 10%). Workers fabricating ES are exposed to dangerously high levels of respirable crystalline silica (RCS) and other toxic chemicals, which increases the risk of developing silicosis and other lung and systemic diseases. The purpose of this review is to explore the epidemiology, occupational risks, regulatory gaps, diagnostic evaluation, and clinical challenges associated with ES dust exposure. MAIN BODY: ES silicosis was first described in the early 2010s among ES countertop workers in Spain, Italy, and Israel. Since then, hundreds of cases have emerged worldwide, namely in China, Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Belgium. Silicosis from ES dust is accelerated and diagnosed after 7-19 years of exposure, often affecting young individuals (median age 33-55 years) from marginalized or immigrant communities. Morbidity and mortality are poor, with high rates of lung transplantation and death. Industrial hygiene air sample monitoring data shows that despite engineering controls such as wet saws and exhaust ventilation, exposure to respirable crystalline silica when cutting ES frequently exceeds safe exposure levels. Diagnostic evaluation and treatment are clinically challenging due to delayed medical screening, misdiagnosis, and lack of treatment options.
conclusionsThis review underscores the urgent need for enhanced occupational safety regulations, active screening, and healthcare support to address the rising burden of ES silicosis among vulnerable worker populations globally.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.