ArticleBMC health services research2025
Nurses' perspectives on the adoption of new smart technologies for patient care: focus group interviews.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Healthcare Providers' perspectives on the adoption of Smart Care Technologies in Korean Long-Term Care Hospitals.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2026Article
- A Frontline Worker's Take on Hybrid Care Implementation in the Hospital Setting.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- ACHO virtual assistant and digital care delivery for treatment adherence: a qualitative study of care practices and representations among nursing professionals.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe adoption of smart technologies for patient care is greatly increasing. IoT-based smart mattresses offer features such as automatic body repositioning for pressure ulcer prevention, weight measurement, vital sign tracking, and rapid response to emergencies. This study explores nurses' perspectives on the adoption of smart technologies, with a particular focus on smart mattresses in hospitals.
methodsFocus group interviews were conducted with 17 nurses from intensive care parts, general wards, and COVID-19 designated wards in a tertiary university hospital in South Korea. Data were collected through online meetings and analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsThematic analysis revealed six major themes and 14 subthemes under three categories. Patient-related perspectives included themes of 'difficulties in meeting patients' care needs' and 'identified areas for technology adoption based on patient care experiences.' Nursing-related perspectives encompassed 'potentials of smart technology for nursing care' and 'increased time and workload due to new device usage.' Technology-related perspectives included 'previous experience with technology devices' and 'expectations for in-development devices.'
conclusionsNurses generally expressed receptiveness to smart technologies including smart mattresses, recognizing their potential to enhance patient care and nursing efficiency. Perspectives varied by department, highlighting the need for tailored solutions. Prior experiences, both positive and negative, offered important insights for designing devices that are more compatible with clinical practice. Incorporating nurses' feedback and addressing educational needs are critical for successful adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.