ArticleBMC surgery2025
Comparing surgical outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for allograft kidney tumors: a retrospective, single-center study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-assisted urologic surgery after kidney transplantation: indications, graft-protection strategies, and outcomes-a scoping review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Surgical Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma in Transplanted Kidneys-A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKidney transplantation is considered the best long-term option for patients with end-stage renal disease; however, immunosuppression increases the risk of developing malignancies. Approximately 0.2-0.5% of kidney transplant recipients experience renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in their allografts. Recently, nephron-sparing surgery has become widely accepted because of its favorable survival outcomes and low risk of recurrence.
methodsIn this study, we retrospectively evaluated the peri- and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for allograft RCC, analyzing five and six patients who underwent OPN and RAPN, respectively, from 1998 to 2023.
resultsThe estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the RAPN group than in the OPN group (6.5 mL [interquartile range (IQR): 1-15] vs. 350 mL [IQR: 139-560], P = 0.006), whereas the operative and renal arterial clamping times were similar. Additionally, the perioperative complication rate and severity were lower in the RAPN group, resulting in a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay than the OPN group (3 days [IQR: 2-5] vs. 10 days [IQR: 8-12], P = 0.01). Postoperative renal function and oncological outcomes were similar between the two groups.
conclusionsRAPN for allograft RCC demonstrated advantages in terms of estimated blood loss and postoperative hospital stay compared with OPN, even though the patients' backgrounds were not adjusted. Therefore, RAPN may be a viable option for managing T1 allograft tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.