ArticleBMC rheumatology2025
The impact of changes in fibromyalgia diagnosis criteria: using NAMCS data (2010-2019) to identify trends.
Article in BMC rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why Fibromyalgia Criteria Keep Changing: A Systematic Review of Misclassification, Measurement, and Diagnostic Spillover.Archives of rheumatology · 2026Article
- The Changes Over 15 Years Within a Pediatric Chronic Pain Service.Paediatric & neonatal pain · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFibromyalgia is currently diagnosed under the 2016 research criteria, a combination of the 2010 and 2011 criteria revisions. The current guidelines have led to ongoing misdiagnosis issues dating back to the criteria initially established by the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR). Given the extensive revisions to the diagnostic criteria in 2016, instances of over-and under-diagnosing as well as measurement errors corresponding to the different diagnostic criteria utilized, the current study sought to investigate changes in the incidence of fibromyalgia diagnoses and the associations between fibromyalgia diagnosis and relevant comorbidities and somatic symptoms of interest.
methodsThis retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study of adults (18 + years of age) used the most recently available National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) datasets from 2010 to 2019. A plot of annual point estimates of the proportion of visits where fibromyalgia was diagnosed (and associated 95% confidence intervals) was generated. In addition, a multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to assess the relationship of covariates available in the NAMCS on the outcome of fibromyalgia diagnosis (yes/no).
resultsSince the implementation of the 2010 ACR criteria, the percentage of visits resulting in a fibromyalgia diagnosis increased prior to the release of the 2016 criteria, after which a general downward trend was observed. Both rheumatoid arthritis (OR 5.51, 95% CI 2.87-10.58) and depression (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.90-3.58) were found to be strongly associated with a fibromyalgia diagnosis. Other comorbid conditions showed minimal associations.
conclusionsBased on the fluctuation in the proportion of NAMCS visits resulting in a fibromyalgia diagnosis post-implementation of the 2016 criteria, the current criteria may not accurately represent the sensitivity to comorbid conditions seen in the 2010 criteria through symptom severity scales. The analysis of comorbidities and somatic symptoms revealed that rheumatoid arthritis and depression continue to be two defining comorbidities in the diagnosis of fibromyalgia; however, diagnostic challenges remain. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.