ArticleGenes & nutrition2025
Exploring the future of nutrigenomics: dietitians' perceptions on integration in Indian practice.
Article in Genes & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNutrigenomics, the study of nutrient-gene interactions, holds immense potential for alleviating India's overburdened healthcare system and improving overall health-related quality of life. Yet, its utility remains in the nascent stages. To understand the factors affecting the implementation of nutrigenomics, we investigate the perceptions of practising dietetic professionals.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the perceptions of Indian dietetic professionals related to the implementation of Nutrigenomics and to understand the factors affecting it.
methodsA total of 249 Indian dietetic professionals participated in an online survey between April 2024 - May 2024. This data was then statistically analyzed using the Chi-square test and Fisher's Exact test. Furthermore, in-depth interviews were conducted for 10 out of the 249 participants, the data collected from the interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsMajority of the dietetic professionals had high awareness (97.2%) and interest (87.5%) in incorporating genetic testing into their practice. While the survey identified several barriers to its integration, such as high costs, (p-value = 0.000), lack of clinical trials (p-value = 0.013), and ethical concerns (p-value = 0.023). The in-depth interviews highlighted the need for increased education, standardization of testing panels, and collaboration among healthcare professionals to enhance the feasibility of nutrigenomics integration.
conclusionIndian dietetic professionals express a positive outlook on integrating nutrigenomics into mainstream healthcare practice. However, successful establishment of personalized nutrition in India also requires addressing key challenges with respect to education, cost, training, development of regulatory frameworks and raising public awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.