ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
A clinical data-driven machine learning approach for predicting the effectiveness of piperacillin-tazobactam in treating lower respiratory tract infections.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A consensus-weighted multi-agent ensemble feature selection framework for antibiotic susceptibility prediction in pediatric respiratory diseases.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in ICU therapeutic decision-making for severe infections.Current opinion in critical care · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn hospitalized patients, inadequate antibiotic dosage leading to bacterial resistance and increased antimicrobial use intensity due to overexposure to antibiotics are common problems. In the present study, we constructed a machine learning model based on patients' clinical information to predict the clinical effectiveness of Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) (4:1) in treating bacterial lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs), to assist clinicians in making better clinical decisions.
methodsWe collected data from patients diagnosed with LRTIs or equivalent diagnoses admitted to the Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Shanghai, between January 1, 2021, and July 31, 2023. A total of 26 relevant clinical features were extracted from this cohort. Following data preprocessing, we trained four models: Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Gaussian Naive Bayes. The dataset was split into training and test sets using a 7:3 ratio. The top-performing models, as determined by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)-Area Under the Curve (AUC) on the independent test set, were subsequently ensembled. Ensemble model (EL) performance was evaluated using bootstrap resampling on the training set and ROC-AUC, recall, accuracy, precision, F1-score, and log loss on an independent test set. The optimal model was then deployed as a web application for clinical outcome prediction.
resultsA total of 1,314 patients primarily treated with TZP as initial empiric antibiotic therapy were enrolled in the analysis. The success group comprised 995 patients (75.7%), while the failure group consisted of 319 patients (24.3%). We constructed an ensemble learning model based on the Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine and Random Forest models, which showed better overall performance. The EL model demonstrated robust performance on an independent test set, exhibiting a ROC-AUC of 0.69, a recall of 0.69, an accuracy of 0.64, a precision of 0.40, a F1-score of 0.50, and a log loss of 0.66. A corresponding web application was then developed and made available at http://106.12.146.54:1020/ .
conclusionsIn this study, we successfully developed and validated an EL model that effectively predicts the clinical effectiveness of TZP (4:1) in treating bacterial LRTIs. The model achieved a balanced performance across key evaluation metrics, demonstrating the model's potential utility in clinical decision-making. The web-based application makes this model readily accessible to clinicians, potentially helping optimize antibiotic dosing decisions and reduce both inadequate treatment and overexposure. While promising, future studies with larger datasets and prospective validation are needed to further improve the model's performance and validate its clinical utility. This work represents a step forward in using machine learning to support antimicrobial stewardship and personalized antibiotic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.