ArticleBMC public health2025
Scoping review of the use of multimorbidity variables in cardiovascular disease risk prediction.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time to first cardiovascular hospitalization after guideline-based treatment optimization: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in northwest Ethiopia.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Comorbidity indices in observational studies on cardiovascular risk.Open heart · 2026Observational
- Beyond the Lungs: Cardiovascular Risk in COPD Patients with a History of Tuberculosis-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Risk prediction of multiple cardiometabolic diseases in middle-aged and older adults using lipid metabolism biomarkers and derived composite measures based on machine learning: a prospective cohort study of CHARLS.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- Impact of multimorbidity on health-related quality of life: the mediation role of intrinsic capacity - evidence from the WHO ICOPE pilot program in Lianyungang of China (2024).Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Many countries use pooled cohort equations or similar risk prediction models to assess atherosclerotic CVD risk to guide preventive measures. There is evidence that clinical CVD risk prediction equations are less accurate for adults with higher levels of multimorbidity (the co-occurrence of multiple long-term conditions). Operating within a single disease paradigm may not be appropriate for adults with multimorbidity who may be at higher risk of both CVD and non-CVD death. This scoping review was conducted to gather evidence on the inclusion of multimorbidity measures in CVD risk models to assess their methodology and identify evidence gaps in the literature.
methodsThe review covers literature from 1 January 2012 to 23 September 2022, using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases published during this period and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting guidelines.
resultsThis review identified fourteen studies reporting multivariable prognostic CVD models that included a multimorbidity variable. Of these, four studies specifically looked at the added benefit of a multimorbidity variable in a CVD risk model. Only one of these studies was conducted in a primary prevention cohort (i.e., people were free of CVD at baseline). This scoping review revealed several primary evidence gaps, notably the limited literature on the topic, the model performance in ethnic subpopulations, and the comparative assessment of alternative multimorbidity variables beyond the Charlson Comorbidity Index.
conclusionsFew studies have assessed the impact of incorporating multimorbidity indices in primary and secondary prevention cohorts. Future research is needed to evaluate the incremental value of multimorbidity indices in cardiovascular disease risk prediction models to inform risk stratification and management strategies in people with multimorbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.