Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40097948›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2025

The Latitudinal Biotic Interaction Hypothesis revisited: contrasting latitudinal richness gradients in actively vs. passively accumulated interaction partners of honey bees.

Alyssa R Cirtwill, Tomas Roslin, Pablo Peña-Aguilera, Agathe Agboto, William Bercê, Svetlana N Bondarchuk, Robert Brodschneider, Behzad Heidari, Camara Kaizirege, Justine Muhoro Nyaga and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Global patterns in plant-pollinator specialization.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Alyssa R CirtwillCarex EcoLogics, Bracebridge, ON, Canada.
Tomas RoslinDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Pablo Peña-AguileraDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Agathe AgbotoUniversity of Abomey-Calavi, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, Laboratory of Agricultural Entomology, Abomey-Calavi, Benin.
William BercêDuilio Meliponicultura, Jundiaí, São Paulo, Brazil.
Svetlana N BondarchukSikhote-Alin State Nature Biosphere Reserve Named After K.G. Abramov, 44 Partizanskaya Str., Terney, Primorsky Krai, 692150, Russia.
Robert BrodschneiderDepartment of Biology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Behzad HeidariIKBM, Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Engineering, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway.
Camara KaiziregeTanzifarm Tanzania Limited, Mlele District, Katavi Region, Tanzania.
Justine Muhoro NyagaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Embu, Embu, Kenya.
Ojonugwa EkpahInstitute of Geoecology, Department Landscape Ecology and Environmental Systems Analysis, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Gonzalo Ossa GomezConserBat EIRL, San Fabian, Ñuble, Chile.
Claudia PazDepartment of Biodiversity, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University, Av 24A 1515, Rio Claro, SP, 13506-900, Brazil.
Christian PirkSocial Insects Research Group, Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Amir Salehi-NajafabadiDepartment of Microbiology, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Anneli SalonenFinnish Beekeepers' Association, Ullanlinnankatu 1 A 3, 00130, Helsinki, Finland.
Chantal SoloniainaDepartment of International Relations and Partnership, Ministry of Education, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Helena WirtaDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. helena.wirta@umu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContrasting hypotheses suggest that the number of biotic interactions per species could either increase towards the equator due to the increasing richness of potential interaction partners (Neutral theory), or decrease in the tropics due to increased biotic competition (Latitudinal Biotic Interaction Hypothesis). Empirical testing of these hypotheses remains limited due to practical limitations, differences in methodology, and species turnover across latitudes. Here, we focus on a single species with a worldwide distribution, the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.), to assess how the number of different types of interactions vary across latitudes. Foraging honey bees interact with many organisms in their local environment, including plants they actively select to visit and microbes that they largely encounter passively (i.e., unintentionally and more or less randomly). Tissue pieces and spores of these organisms are carried to the hive by foraging honey bees and end up preserved within honey, providing a rich record of the species honey bees encounter in nature.

resultsUsing honey samples from around the globe, we show that while honey bees visit more plant taxa at higher latitudes, they encounter more bacteria in the tropics.

conclusionsThese different components of honey bees' biotic niche support the latitudinal biotic interaction hypothesis for actively-chosen interactions, but are more consistent with neutral theory (assuming greater bacterial richness in the tropics) for unintentional interactions.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAnimalsBeesEcosystemHoneyApis melliferaBacteriaDNA metabarcodingFlowering plantNeutral theoryPollination

Identifiers

PMID40097948
PMCPMC11912709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.