ArticleJournal of neuromuscular diseases2025
Visualizing ambulatory performance by age and rates of decline among patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Article in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Evaluation of Givinostat in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, and Natural History Comparisons.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Trial
- Regenerative Index: a method to assess muscle regeneration in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Skeletal muscle · 2026Article
- Regenerative Index reveals declining muscle regeneration in paediatric patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), age at symptom onset and rate of decline thereafter vary considerably. This study contrasted disease progression over time using the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) in an overall sample of patients with DMD (mean age 7.1 years; baseline total NSAA score 22.2) with that of a centrally representative subgroup (mean age 6.9 years; NSAA score 24.0) defined according to median age at loss of ambulation. The average disease trajectory in the overall sample understated the more rapid rates of decline experienced by patients in the centrally representative subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.