ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Expanding Patient-Centered Medical Home Teams in Primary Care: Qualitative Evaluation of Implementation Experiences from a Multi-site Pilot Within the VA Healthcare System.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Person-Centered Multimorbidity Care in UK Primary Care: Identifying Changes to Practice.Annals of family medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMore than a decade ago, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) model in primary care (PC) to improve healthcare access, care coordination, and patient outcomes. In 2021, VA's Office of Primary Care piloted three new PCMH models that aimed to improve provider efficiency and patient healthcare access by adding new team roles and increasing panel sizes.
objectiveTo describe frontline staff experiences and lessons learned during implementation of expanded PCMH team models.
designQualitative, semi-structured interviews of 25 frontline staff at 6 VA sites participating in the PCMH Modernization pilot conducted between March and August 2022.
participantsInterview participants included physicians, nurses, physical therapists, high-risk care managers, and other staff. APPROACH: We used a rapid analysis approach that included creating and validating interview summaries, developing a matrix of interview domains to identify common themes, and iterative discussion among the research team to build consensus and interpret findings. KEY
resultsWe found that when the basic PCMH structure and processes (e.g., staffing, huddling, pre-visit planning) were not in place, it was challenging to integrate new team members and to increase panel sizes. Role clarity challenges were also introduced by adding certain roles to PCMH teams. The physical therapist and high-risk care manager roles were seen as positive additions to PCMH models. Lastly, matching panel size expansion with staffing capacity was crucial to optimizing team efficiency while increasing patient healthcare access.
conclusionsHealthcare administrators considering expanding PCMH team models may need to thoroughly assess and address site readiness (e.g., adherence to foundational PCMH model, staffing, and practices) prior to implementation. Role clarity challenges should also be anticipated when adding new team roles. Physical therapists and high-risk care managers could be important contributions to existing PCMH models for offloading provider workload and improving population health management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.