SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Traumatic vertebral artery occlusion is associated with high rates of recanalization: insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Traumatic Vertebral Artery Injury: Diagnosis, Natural History, and Key Considerations for Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVertebral artery occlusion (VAO) is a known complication of blunt cervical injuries and can be associated with a risk of devastating strokes. VAO can spontaneously recanalize, particularly following cervical spine intervention. The aim of this study is to examine overall recanalization rates, recanalization in the context of cervical spine intervention, and the associations between VAO and stroke, spinal cord injury, and acute cervical deformity.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and manual citation searches. Included studies reported at least 5 adult patients with traumatic VAO and delayed radiographic outcomes, unless embolization was performed for permanent occlusion during the initial admission. Cervical spine intervention was defined as open surgery or external traction. Random effects meta-analysis was used.
resultsFifteen of 755 studies were included. VAO was associated with spinal cord injury in 67% of cases (95%CI, 43-92%, n = 132, p < 0.001) and acute cervical deformity in 73% (95%CI, 62-83%, n = 91, p < 0.001). The incidence of stroke at presentation was 13% (95%CI, 6-19%, n = 269, p < 0.001). The overall rate of VAO recanalization was 36% in non-embolized patients (95%CI, 23-48%, n = 285, p < 0.001). When only studies reporting on cervical spine intervention were considered, the rate of recanalization post-intervention was 57% (95%CI, 30-85%, n = 45, p < 0.001). Follow-up periods were highly variable, ranging from 1 to 103 weeks.
conclusionsA substantial portion of traumatic VAOs recanalized at follow-up, with more than half of patients undergoing cervical spine intervention recanalizing. The analyses revealed considerable heterogeneity, likely indicative of variability in clinical practices, established guidelines and reporting standards. These findings offer important insights into the natural history of traumatic VAO and should be considered when choosing management strategies for this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40097874What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.