ArticleScientific reports2025
A Two stage deep learning network for automated femoral segmentation in bilateral lower limb CT scans.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning pipeline for trapezium segmentation in thumb radiographs.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents the development of a deep learning-based two-stage network designed for the efficient and precise segmentation of the femur in full lower limb CT images. The proposed network incorporates a dual-phase approach: rapid delineation of regions of interest followed by semantic segmentation of the femur. The experimental dataset comprises 100 samples obtained from a hospital, partitioned into 85 for training, 8 for validation, and 7 for testing. In the first stage, the model achieves an average Intersection over Union of 0.9671 and a mean Average Precision of 0.9656, effectively delineating the femoral region with high accuracy. During the second stage, the network attains an average Dice coefficient of 0.953, sensitivity of 0.965, specificity of 0.998, and pixel accuracy of 0.996, ensuring precise segmentation of the femur. When compared to the single-stage SegResNet architecture, the proposed two-stage model demonstrates faster convergence during training, reduced inference times, higher segmentation accuracy, and overall superior performance. Comparative evaluations against the TransUnet model further highlight the network's notable advantages in accuracy and robustness. In summary, the proposed two-stage network offers an efficient, accurate, and autonomous solution for femur segmentation in large-scale and complex medical imaging datasets. Requiring relatively modest training and computational resources, the model exhibits significant potential for scalability and clinical applicability, making it a valuable tool for advancing femoral image segmentation and supporting diagnostic workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.