Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40097820›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Intercontinental movement of exotic fungi on decorative wood used in aquatic and terrestrial aquariums.

Robert A Blanchette, Nickolas N Rajtar, Amelia G Lochridge, Benjamin W Held

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert A BlanchetteDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, 55108, St. Paul, MN, USA. robertb@umn.edu.
Nickolas N RajtarDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, 55108, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Amelia G LochridgeDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, 55108, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Benjamin W HeldDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, 55108, St. Paul, MN, USA.

Funding

Minnesota Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center, University of Minnesota no number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intercontinental movement of fungi or fungus-like organisms brings nonnative species into areas where they may become invasive pathogens of trees and other plants. In the past century, many examples such as Dutch elm disease, sudden oak death, laurel wilt, and others have resulted in large economic losses and ecological disasters. Although various safeguards to prevent the transport of potential pathogens have been in effect, new avenues of introduction have occurred causing new disease outbreaks. This study examined fungi in wood shipped from Asia that is used for decorative purposes in aquatic and terrestrial aquariums. From 44 imported wood samples, 202 cultures representing 123 different fungal taxa were obtained and identified using molecular methods. These included 31 species not previously reported in the United States, 21 potential plant pathogens, 37 species of wood decay fungi and 24 taxa with a 97% sequence match or less to known isolates suggesting these are unknown species. The results demonstrate that wood used for decorative purposes in aquariums harbor large numbers of diverse fungi that remain viable during shipping and storage. These fungi are currently being imported into areas where they are not native, and they may pose serious biosecurity threats to the United States and other countries around the world.

Indexed as

FungiWoodIntroduced SpeciesPlant DiseasesUnited StatesAscomycotaBasidiomycotaInvasive microorganismsMicrobial ecologyPlant pathogensSpiderwood

Identifiers

PMID40097820
PMCPMC11914568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.