Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40097767›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Lumos: Software for Multi-level Multi-reader Comparison of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Late Gadolinium Enhancement Scar Quantification.

Philine Reisdorf, Jonathan Gavrysh, Clemens Ammann, Maximilian Fenski, Christoph Kolbitsch, Steffen Lange, Anja Hennemuth, Jeanette Schulz-Menger, Thomas Hadler

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Philine ReisdorfWorking Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), a joint cooperation between the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3968-8003
Jonathan GavryshWorking Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), a joint cooperation between the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3699-5962
Clemens AmmannWorking Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), a joint cooperation between the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5962-4008
Maximilian FenskiWorking Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), a joint cooperation between the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5943-305X
Christoph KolbitschPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4355-8368
Steffen LangeDepartment of Computer Sciences, Hochschule Darmstadt - University of Applied Sciences, Darmstadt, Germany.
Anja HennemuthDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0737-7375
Jeanette Schulz-MengerWorking Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), a joint cooperation between the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany. jeanette.schulz-menger@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3100-1092
Thomas HadlerWorking Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), a joint cooperation between the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6151-6858

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BIOQICDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GRK2260Deutsche Herzstiftung S/09/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) offers state-of-the-art myocardial tissue differentiation. The CMR technique late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) currently provides the noninvasive gold standard for the detection of myocardial fibrosis. Typically, thresholding methods are used for fibrotic scar tissue quantification. A major challenge for standardized CMR assessment is large variations in the estimated scar for different methods. The aim was to improve quality assurance for LGE scar quantification, a multi-reader comparison tool "Lumos" was developed to support quality control for scar quantification methods. The thresholding methods and an exact rasterization approach were implemented, as well as a graphical user interface (GUI) with statistical and case-specific tabs. Twenty LGE cases were considered with half of them including artifacts and clinical results for eight scar quantification methods computed. Lumos was successfully implemented as a multi-level multi-reader comparison software, and differences between methods can be seen in the statistical results. Histograms visualize confounding effects of different methods. Connecting the statistical level with the case level allows for backtracking statistical differences to sources of differences in the threshold calculation. Being able to visualize the underlying groundwork for the different methods in the myocardial histogram gives the opportunity to identify causes for different thresholds. Lumos showed the differences in the clinical results between cases with artifacts and cases without artifacts. A video demonstration of Lumos is offered as supplementary material 1. Lumos allows for a multi-reader comparison for LGE scar quantification that offers insights into the origin of reader differences.

Indexed as

CicatrixHeartImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingSoftwareComputer GraphicsFibrosisGadoliniumHumansMyocardiumUser-Computer InterfaceGadoliniumCardiovascular magnetic resonanceComparison softwareLate gadolinium enhancementQuality assuranceScar quantification

Identifiers

PMID40097767
PMCPMC12701143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.