ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025
Nanomedicine innovations in colon and rectal cancer: advances in targeted drug and gene delivery systems.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- eGFP tagged ZnO nanoparticles from glioblastoma targeting ferroptosis and MRP1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Multifunctional nanoplatform for tumor chemodynamic and self-amplified photodynamic cascade therapy.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Natural Polymers Based Biocompatible Nanomedicines for Targeting Colon Cancer: Prospects and Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Anticancer efficacy of sericin (silkworm protein) and sericin chitosan conjugated silver nanoparticles against colorectal cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Article
- Nanotechnology-Driven Drug Delivery Systems for Lung Cancer: Computational Advances and Clinical Perspectives.Thoracic cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanotechnology has revolutionized cancer diagnostics and therapy, offering unprecedented possibilities to overcome the constraints of conventional treatments. This study provides a detailed overview of the current progress and difficulties in the creation of nanostructured materials, with a specific emphasis on their use in drug and gene delivery systems. The study examines tactics that attempt to improve the effectiveness and safety of chemotherapeutic drugs such as doxorubicin (Dox) by focusing on the potential of antibody-drug conjugates and functionalized nanoparticles. Moreover, it clarifies the challenges encountered in administering nanoparticles orally for gastrointestinal treatments, emphasizing the crucial physicochemical properties that affect their behavior in the gastrointestinal system. This study highlights the transformational potential of nanostructured materials in precision oncology by examining advanced breakthroughs such cell membrane-camouflaged nanoparticles and inorganic nanoparticles designed for gastrointestinal disorders. The text investigates the processes involved in the absorption of nanoparticles and their destruction in lysosomes, revealing the many methods in which enterocytes take up these particles. This study strongly supports the use of advanced nanoparticle-based methods to reduce the harmful effects on the whole body and improve the effectiveness of therapy, based on a thorough examination of current experiments on animals and humans. The main objective of this paper is to provide a fundamental comprehension that will stimulate more investigation and practical use in the field of cancer nanomedicine, advancing its boundaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40097759What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.