ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of the winning technical and tactical actions of the best female table tennis players in the years 1970-2021.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the research was to determine the quantitative structure of winning systems of the world's leading women players in table tennis in the years 1970-2021. The study used the Wu Huanqin game analysis method. It consists of observing the game, counting the scoring actions within the three stages or situations of a rally: serve/attack', 'return/attack', and 'stalemate phase'. In total 165 women's matches were analysed. The type and size of the ball (celluloid vs. plastic and 38 mm vs. 40 mm diameter) were factors according to which three research periods had been distinguished. With the changes of the ball used an increase in the use of subsequent actions in the so-called stalemate phase can be seen. This is probably related to slowing down the game and reducing the use of spin rotation when playing a large, plastic ball. The number of points scored directly with the serve decreases in particular periods. However, the use of side-forehand-serves and forehand-hook-serves increases over time. Service returns are dominated by backhand returns. This may be related to the greater possibilities of using disguised and diverse techniques to receive the serve (e.g. push, so called "banana" flick or "strawberry" flick, topspin). An interesting observation also was the large number of scorings with repetitive techniques in stalemate phase (e.g. repetition of topspin forehand or block backhand).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.