ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2025
Exploring the association between adolescent psychotic-like experiences and components of social performance using a multi-level virtual reality paradigm.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure and temporal stability of adolescent psychotic experiences: findings from a German longitudinal cohort study.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring the association between adolescent psychotic-like experiences and components of social performance using a multi-level virtual reality paradigm.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite evidence linking psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) and social functioning deficits in youth at the risk of transitioning to psychosis, this association remains poorly understood. To address this, we explored the association between components of social performance and PLEs in adolescents aged 13-18 using a novel virtual reality (VR) paradigm for real-time assessment.
methodsAdolescents (N = 146) aged 13-18 were recruited as part of a larger cohort study conducted by the same research group (YVORI_PRO) and invited to participate via the following criteria: those reporting highly indicative positive PLEs (HIP, N = 88) and those reporting no or less indicative PLEs (no-HIP, N = 58). Self-report, behavioural and physiological components of social performance were collected using a portable VR headset and a medical wristband. Participants entered a virtual recreational area with three levels of social ambiguity and were encouraged to interact with avatars. MANOVA was performed to check for overall group differences and repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted to examine the effects of group and level of ambiguity, as well as their interaction, on daily social performance.
resultsDuring virtual social interactions, adolescents with HIP reported higher levels of anxiety, fear of negative evaluation (FNE) and avoidance than the no-HIP group. No significant difference between groups was found for self-confidence. With increasing social ambiguity in VR, anxiety, FNE and avoidance increased in both groups, while self-confidence decreased. No significant group differences were found in behavioural or physiological components of social performance. Interpersonal distance and pulse rate increased significantly with increasing level of ambiguity, but pulse rate variability and skin conductance did not.
conclusionThe results suggest that adolescents with HIP may present specific difficulties related to social performance, which may carry additional psychosis risk. The new VR social scenario appears to be an acceptable, safe and effective tool to measure social performance in adolescents experiencing PLEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.