ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025
Evolution of ophthalmological care in adult with diabetes in France between 2010 and 2022: a nationwide study.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to describe ophthalmological care of adults with diabetes in France and its evolution between 2010 and 2022.
methodsIn this study, we used the ESND, a representative permanent random sample of 2/100th of the entire French population. Ophthalmological care was defined by the combination of ophthalmological procedures (fundus examination, color fundus photography, Optical Coherence Tomography..) and/or ophthalmological treatment (intravitreal injection or laser treatment) during the year. Changes in annual rates during the study period were assessed using linear regression models excluding 2020.
resultsFrom 2010 to 2022, the number of adults treated for diabetes in the ENSD increased from 48 329 patients (mean age 65.3 ± 13.0, 46.3% women) to 68 397 patients (mean age 67.0 ± 13.2, 44.8% women). Among them, the annual rate of ophthalmological care was stable (46.5% in 2010 and 48.5% in 2022) and the difference was not significant (β = 0.10% per year, p = 0.11). The yearly ophthalmological treatment rate increased significantly (3.3% in 2010 and 5.3% in 2022, β = 0.2% per year, p < 0.0001). Rates were lower during the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020.Women, individuals aged between 66-80 years, those living in the least deprived areas and those treated with combined insulin and non-insulin treatment had higher yearly ophthalmological care rate.
conclusionIn this large nationwide representative study with recent and updated data, although ophthalmological treatment rate has increased over the decade mainly due to intravitreal injections, less than half of the diabetic patients receive yearly ophthalmological care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40097633What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.